On 11 Jan 2013, at 19:25, Scott Marlow <smar...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 12/11/2013 11:44 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote: >> Ales, >> >> Can you confirm that some static method is involved here (which was the >> case for HV-818)? I can't see one on your Email class but maybe there is >> one on AbstractEntity? >> >> If so, I think releasing a 5.0.2.Final would make sense, containing the >> following three issues: >> >> * HV-818 (this issue) >> * HV-838 (the class loader leak) >> * HV-835 (updating to ClassMate 1.0) >> >> The last one is not strictly required as the changes from 0.8 to 1.0 are >> basically doc fixes, still I'd prefer to have HV use the same version as >> WF does since recently. >> >> Scott, do you know when the cut-off is for delivering stuff into WF CR1? > > The cut-off is past but I still see changes being added to WF 8 (there > are a few TCK failures to tackle still). So, I think we should try to > get 5.0.2 into WF 8.
Well, we need to first cut a 5.0.2 release and before we do I would like to make sure we have an actual solution for the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException. —Hardy _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
