On Tue 2013-08-27 10:22, Steve Ebersole wrote: > On Tue 27 Aug 2013 10:16:38 AM CDT, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > >+1 to have a suffix not related tot he draft. Like you I have pushed > >spec jars that did not reflect eh state of a draft necessarily. > > > >BTW, why retrofit that scheme? Why not just apply it for 2.1? > > Well applying it for 2.1 is in fact retrofitting it too. I have > already pushed the 2.1 "Final". As for why 1.0 and 2.0 also, I just > like consistency; it makes me happy :) >
If that makes you happy to fight Nexus, that makes me happy to watch you ;) _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
