On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Hardy Ferentschik <ha...@hibernate.org> wrote: >> I think we should move to .Next: >> - METAGEN-72 - Generate attributes for @Transient columns : it might >> be nice to have but it's definitely not something required (there are >> a lot of other binding generators out there like bindgen) > > I am not even sure if we should do this at all. Should the static metamodel > really contain transient properties? > The meta model is primarily there to write type safe criteria queries and you > cannot target transient fields there. > So I am actually tempted to reject this one.
+1 >> - METAGEN-46 - Add ability to specify a desired package : definitely >> accessory > > Right. Personally I don't see even a point in this. Happy to move this one +1 >> - METAGEN-89 - generated model misses <T> : if really wanted, I think >> it probably requires more work than reasonable for 1.3.0 > > This is another one, I am not even sure about whether it would be correct. I > need to think more about this one. > If you see any value in iet me know :-) Not really but I'm not a heavy user of the metamodel. We mostly use QueryDSL to write our queries now. > If you want to help out feel free to look at remaining issues, for example > METAGEN-86 (even so we need to first assess > whether we can fix that for this release). I took a look at them this afternoon (thus my previous email) and I don't think I'm a good choice to fix the remaining ones as they are really on parts of jpamodelgen/Hibernate I don't use or know. I want to work on some Hibernate Search stuff in the next few days so I don't think I'll be able to help more on this front. I updated the Maven versions in this pull request this afternoon as I thought it might be useful: https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-metamodelgen/pull/7 . HTH -- Guillaume _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
