On Thu 2013-08-01 11:41, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > Why? The few occasions where it happens a fully qualified class name does not > hurt. > It is not enough that it is considered bad practise and even Checkstyle for > that > reason does not allow it in the UnusedImports check?
I actually do find it does hurt to have the fqcn in the JavaDoc as reading the JavaDoc from the source is probably 50% of the usage. Does it hurt enough that it outweighs the possible violation? I think it does. Note that the author of this rule did consider it bad practice but either wasn't sure enough or had enough backlash that he did put an option to change the behavior :) _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
