On 13 Jan 2013, at 2:11 PM, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> wrote:
> 2013/6/13 Hardy Ferentschik <ha...@hibernate.org> > > On 13 Jan 2013, at 8:47 AM, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > > Would creating a "real" query language instead of a serialized object > > representation make sense then? > > You mean the Lucene query language - > http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versioned_docs/versions/3_4_0/queryparsersyntax.html > ;-) > In the end it comes down to that. > > Maybe, if that has everything needed, why not? Or is a goal to hide the fact > that Lucene is used underneath? > > What would the purpose of a new query language be? I guess it would be more > object centric, but is this relevant for a user? > > What's the purpose of the JSON notation? I think for a user its nicer to > express a query in a dedicated query language instead of a general-purpose > object serialization format. As it is nicer for a human to express queries in > say HQL or SQL instead of describing e.g. a "HQL object" in JSON or XML. If > this is going to be used by application code, it probably doesn't make a big > difference. > > I guess I just don't yet really understand what's the use case behind. Right, that's what I am also trying to see/find. --Hardy _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
