On 19 May 2013 08:27, Hardy Ferentschik <ha...@hibernate.org> wrote: > +1 > > I was not even aware of it. Was it one of your experiments?
No it was one of Emmanuel's experiments, so I'd like his +1 as well ;-) I don't dislike the concept, maybe this is something that could be reincarnated as an OGM dialect? Or if it was meant to be more Lucene-API centric, maybe it could become a separate module in Search (separate than hibernate-search-engine, so at the same level of hibernate-search-orm) Sanne > > > > On 18 May 2013, at 23:59, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> wrote: > >> There is an experimental feature in Hibernate Search which is as well >> known and as well documented as an easter egg: >> >> org.hibernate.search.sandbox.standalone.FullTextManager >> >> allows to use Hibernate Search in "standalone" mode, i.e. without a >> database and storing all data in the Lucene index only. >> >> This doesn't even have tests, but hasn't harmed any kitten so far. >> However now while I'm looking at doing some refactorings in >> preparation of Lucene 4, this looks like something that will need a >> complete rewrite, and is adding some resistance already by depending >> on deprecated methods which I'd rather remove asap. >> >> So I'm proposing to delete it, for the time being with no replacement. >> If there is interest we'd need to rewrite it anyway, but I'd prefer >> doing that eventually after the migration. >> >> Are we all ok with this? >> >> Cheers, >> Sanne >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
