Oops, did reply instead of reply-all
On 03/04/2013 07:23 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > Personal preference I guess, but while developing major features I > find it easier to keep track of my ongoing work that way > > On Mar 4, 2013 7:02 AM, "Emmanuel Bernard" <emman...@hibernate.org > <mailto:emman...@hibernate.org>> wrote: > > nice, I'll have a look. If I can squeeze a bit of OGM friendliness to > the redesign, that would be a nice bonus. > > By the way, any reason to create a dedicated repo instead of a branch? > I mistakenly imported your repo in my orm repo ;) > > Emmanuel > > On Mon 2013-02-25 13:19, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > I believe something like the work I had in mind for > > > https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/wiki/Proposal---Loader-redesign > > is the best option for implementing JPA 2.1 "entity graph" > support into > > Hibernate. To that end I have been working on that proposal to > see how > > quickly that could come about. > > > > Essentially the phase we need to tie in "entity graph" support is a > > redefinition of the current JoinWalkers. The approach I took, > at a high > > level, is that of the visitor pattern. > > > > The work currently lives at > > https://github.com/sebersole/hibernate-loader-redesign I'd > appreciate > > any extras eyes. > > > > Longer term I'd like the stuff that lives in the > > org.hibernate.loader.walking package to be part of the run time > > (persister) metadata, but for the moment I just use wrapping and > > delegation. > > _______________________________________________ > > hibernate-dev mailing list > > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
