We all have agreed that Ejb3Configuration is a mess. In my JPA 2.1 branch I again decided to look at attacking that problem. So I came up with the notion of an EntityManagerFactoryBuilder that takes the place of Ejb3Configuration.
That code is all in place and all tests that use JPA boostrapping through Persistence or PersistenceProvider are passing. I still have not changed the base test classes that build an Ejb3Configuration as means to bootstrap HEM, so I am not sure how much of that logic is missing. The reason I stopped is that what I REALLY want to do is to just rip out Ejb3Configuration. We deprecated it back in 4.0 for just this purpose. We knew that we wanted to replace it and that Ejb3Configuration would simply not work when we went to integrate metamodel. EntityManagerFactoryBuilder is built to work with the new metamodel code. So bottom line, unless I hear compelling reason(s) not to, I plan on removing Ejb3Configuration from the codebase. The sooner the better. -- st...@hibernate.org http://hibernate.org _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
