I think we should release one: we already backported some important fixes, especially because Guillaume helped with it (among others), which was very welcome.
So I can volunteer in making the release happen as I think such contributions should not be discouraged by lack of tag/release credentials, but I wonder if we should not fix some more issues on 3.4, especially one: I've seen some more people complaining about issues in Lucene specificially, and the 3.4 branch is using the rather old Lucene version 3.1. https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HSEARCH-885 So I think we should solve that, and interestingly enough we can just bump the version from Lucene 3.1 to 3.4 without any code change, or to get 3.5 backporting one patch. What puzzles me more if we should actually update Lucene in a minor version - that was not our custom in the past, but previously Lucene would take much longer for a new version and use minor versions (I remember upgrading to 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3 ..) while now the Lucene team seems to have changed strategy and are doing 3.1.0, 3.2.0, .. 3.5.0 : so could we consider it acceptable to upgrade the Lucene version in HS 3.4.2 ? Options: 1- not upgrade at all 2- bump Lucene to 3.4.0 3- Upgrade to Lucene 3.5.0 : Needs someone to volunteer in backporting the needed code changes. What do you think? The only other nasty bug on 3.4.0 is HSEARCH-975: if someone takes responsibility on it we can include it, or it will wait for next. TBH I don't think we can solve it without moving JGroups to a separate module(s), and might not be worth the effort since it's not an issue in 4.x. Cheers, Sanne On 13 February 2012 13:08, Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org> wrote: > Sanne, Hardy and I don't have specific plans to release a 3.4.x. Our general > strategy is to support the latest stable branch and do new work on the next > version. Older branches are out of this equation. > > But we are not against the community doing the work. A release is a bit of an > extreme as it requires several credentials but we can think of something. > What do you all think? > > On 11 févr. 2012, at 19:22, Guillaume Smet wrote: > >> Hi Hibernate Search developers, >> >> Is there any plan to release 3.4.2 soon? >> >> We especially would like to see HSEARCH-1020 released in an official >> 3.4.x release as we have a couple of applications in production we >> won't move to 4.x. I would like to remove the workaround we added (we >> define a non default boost strategy to force reindexing entities on >> update... cough cough...) >> >> Thanks for your feedback. >> >> -- >> Guillaume >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
