On 5 déc. 2011, at 17:01, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > Thanks! Looks like a great start. > > Some questions/considerations: > # In case of multi-level grids, I'd assume that the option is > specified only on the mapping, but doesn't need to be specified at > Query time?
That's correct. > # Not using anything fancy from the Lucene side correct? Just exact > term matches with boolean operators? yep. Lucene / Solr spatial is in a moving state and we don't think we need the fancy things they are planning. We will revisit when they come up with something but I don't think we will. > # Who are those geosuckers ? Nicolas tried to argue with me that building a time based circle was hard. I believe he and the whole profession are too lazy :) > # I would consider it very useful to provide scoring according to > distance; shouldn't be hard to make a custom Similarity which does > that, might be much harder to create one which is actually fast > enough, but I believe there are several examples in the Lucene > community. If you have some pointers, send them to Nicolas or even better open a jira issue for variable scoring and add the data to it. > > To answer your question on "centeredOn", I'd avoid a strong dependency > on JTS. The "Object" option you propose could be an interface, and we > create a factory class which returns them; users should then be able > to use the JTS enabled factory or a dumb one. How would that look in practice? _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
