<jbott> Meeting ended Tue Aug 16 15:13:33 2011 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) <jbott> Minutes: http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2011/hibernate-dev.2011-08-16-15.02.html <jbott> Minutes (text): http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2011/hibernate-dev.2011-08-16-15.02.txt <jbott> Log: http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2011/hibernate-dev.2011-08-16-15.02.log.html
Basically we will go with option 1. We will add package.html (package-info?) to state that the org.hibernate.metamodel package is experimental and a work in progress. This Wednesday's release will be CR1 for 4.0 On 08/15/2011 12:08 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > This follows up on a discussion from today's irc developer meeting, so > see notes for backstory > > The new metamodel code is taking a lot longer than anticipated. Those of > us at the meeting agreed that we do not see it being finished in the > next 2-4 weeks which is kind of the outside edge I wanted to see for 4.0 > so we will be dropping that work as milestone for the 4.0 release. > > Which means we need to decide on how to move forward on 4.0. The options > brought up during the meeting include: > 1) Just keep the Configuration and org.hibernate.mapping stuff in place > 2) Use org.hibernate.metamodel.MetadataSources, > org.hibernate.metamodel.Metadata, etc but retrofit them to use > org.hibernate.mapping stuff > 3) Just keep chugging with 4.0 and upstream projects (JBoss AS, for > example) will just need to use 3.6 > > Each of those have associated pros and cons (again see meeting minutes). > Lets meet up quickly tomorrow at same time as normal dev meeting and > vote on these and discuss other alternatives. > -- st...@hibernate.org http://hibernate.org _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
