Yeah, I have spoken with them about it via email as well, so they are aware of it.
On 06/08/2011 09:47 AM, Strong Liu wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:02 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > >> The only use case I am really interested in for "simple map based" >> caching is the test suite. Its the whole reason I did not do the things >> Strong and I discussed on the other thread already. >> >> Perhaps we move "simple map based" caching impl to the hibernate-testing >> module? The the test suite can continue to use it but we have >> explicitly published the intent. > > actually this was the next question i was going to ask :D > I have started on this (fyi > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-6297), but i > can't make it into today's release. > so, if there is no other objection, i will move the concurrent hash map based > 2l cache impl into testing module. > > btw, the ehcache integration is broken due to the cache spi change, the > RegionFactory impl in ehcache project still uses old hibernate package, i > have filed them a jira. > >> >> And yes I totally agree that we should be driving folks to proper cache >> integrations, namely the infinispan and/or ehcache integrations. The >> others (oscache, swarmcache, etc) have been removed already. >> >> >> On 06/08/2011 07:26 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >>> I always try to understand what's the main reason motivating people to >>> use it. Likely the zero dependencies, "let's just try one" ? >>> >>> We could bake a very simple implementation based as you say on a >>> ConcurrentHashMap, and implement a simple eviction is simple. But I'm >>> afraid that offering such a feature would drive away from proper >>> implementations, which we should encourage to use. >>> >>> Sanne >>> >>> 2011/6/8 Emmanuel Bernard<emman...@hibernate.org>: >>>> I always die a little when I see someone using HashtableCacheProvider. >>>> >>>> What do you think of removing it entirely. Worse case, we could provide an >>>> implementation that is backed by ConcurrentHashMap but even with that, we >>>> would get no eviction policy etc. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> >> -- >> Steve Ebersole<st...@hibernate.org> >> http://hibernate.org >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > -- Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> http://hibernate.org _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
