2011/6/6 Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org>: > That's a backward compatible change so it needs to be done in 4.0
That's why I'm proposing it now again. Would you agree on it? Sanne > On 6 juin 2011, at 11:58, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > >> 2011/6/6 Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org>: >>> >>> On 6 juin 2011, at 11:29, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> 2011/6/6 Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org>: >>>>> Because somehow we need people to be able to index the id of embedded >>>>> objects. >>>> >>>> But why, we don't ever use it right? Is the purpose to make it >>>> possible for people to include restrictions on the ids when creating >>>> queries? >>> >>> yes >>> >>>> >>>>> And at the time, I decided that automatically indexing them was harmless. >>>>> Either we stay as is or we add a specific annotation to ask for id >>>>> indexing in embedded objects >>>> >>>> Wouldn't @Field work for such purpose? >>>> >>> >>> Not entirely as it would index the id twice when the @Indexed @Entity is >>> top level >> >> Right, so could we add an option to @DocumentId(includeWhenEmbedding=true) ? >> >> I'd have it default to "false", as while I agree that i might be of >> some use, I never needed it. >> >> >>>> Sanne >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Emmanuel >>>>> >>>>> On 3 juin 2011, at 14:42, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> About this post: >>>>>> https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=1011255 >>>>>> >>>>>> I remember this came up before, but I don't remember if we had >>>>>> identified a good reason for why we're storing the ids for >>>>>> @IndexedEmbedded objects? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Sanne >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>>>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
