On Mon, 23 May 2011 16:58:12 +0200, Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be fine for me to rename it, assuming it doesn't create a > mess when backporting patches? Given our experience w/ Core I would in this case do the rename also on the 3.6 branch. At least directory wise. We can always configure the final artifact name in the pom. --Hardy _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
