2011/4/4 Hardy Ferentschik <ha...@hibernate.org>: > Hi, > > just upgrading now to Lucene 3.1 and go directly Final seems wrong to me as > well. > I agree that in this case we should do a CR2 first. > > If other deadlines are more important I think we have to defer the upgrade.
of course, just I don't know how much the other deadlines are important, vs how much we decided that to "cap" the effort on this release. As almost all work was done already, I think we could give people a week to try it out; the additional effort is just the release process. Sanne > > --Hardy > > On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:08:44 +0200, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> I'm sure you all have heard all the noise about the Lucene 3.1 >> release, it has indeed some interesting changes [1]; it's almost >> drop-in compatible with Lucene 3.0.x but providing some interesting >> performance improvements and a huge amount of bugfixes. >> Some of these fixes are memory leaks, index corruption, failing to >> properly update index contents, returning stale IndexReaders.. a long >> list of improvements that we would like to provide to our users as >> well. >> >> In practice, I already did all the work: >> https://github.com/Sanne/hibernate-search/commits/HSEARCH-705 >> >> Just one concern: we're currently in CR1 phase. >> Shall we get this in, or postpone for 3.5 ? >> >> Some details: >> >> If someone was to try to use current Hibernate Search with Lucene 3.1: >> * Faceting won't work >> * RAMDirectory won't work >> There are many more changes in the tests, but this is of no interest to >> users. >> >> In the opposite case, if we upgrade and people wished to stay on >> Lucene <3.1, it won't work: >> we need to use some of the new APIs, especially TotalHitCountCollector >> to count for matches is now a requirement when queryResultSize() is >> used, but this class didn't exist in Lucene 3.0.x. >> >> The Infinispan Lucene Directory works fine with all versions of Lucene >> 2.9.x, 3.0.x, 3.1.0, so this dependency is not going to block this. >> >> Opinions? if there's time for it, I'd propose a CR2 to get this update >> in, would be nice to have HSEARCH-679 as well as Tom contributed a >> test for it. >> >> Sanne > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
