Currently, if a callback (jpa-style, Lifecycle, Listener) called during during 
a flush results in an action (as in ActionQueue) being added, that action is 
ignored until the next flush cycle.

I thought we discussed (in st louis) adding a feature to allow those actions 
to be caught up in the original flush cycle.  But I cannot remember the 
outcome of that discussion as to whether that was something we wanted to look 
at for 4.0.  

The solution is essentially a recursive flush.  There is obviously a danger 
there and we would certainly want to depth-limit this.

What do y'all think about getting this into 4.0?

---
Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>
http://hibernate.org
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Reply via email to