+1 for java5 and +1 for concurrency improvements that can happen as a result.
On 12/01/2009 09:59 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > I guess I have just been waiting until we can actually leverage 1.5 > features (ala utilize enums or expose generics/typing). That will not > happen for 3.5. > > Now statistics are encapsulated behind a set of interfaces (Statistics > and StatisticsImplementor). We could make this alterable like I did for > JDBC 3/4 based on the JVM. That would mean reflection code though. > > I do not actually know of any real cases of Hiberate being used in 1.4 > environments today. So maybe we can just make it 1.5 compatible. > > Votes? > > > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:38 +0100, Alex Snaps wrote: > >> We've been doing some improvement to the Hibernate statistics at >> Terracotta, when we realized how much the synchronization on it was >> impacting throughput in our tests. >> That is work we wanted to contribute back to you guys, should >> Hibernate Core be target at 1.5. As it seems that's not yet the case, >> so there isn't much you guys will be able to do with these changes... >> We discussed about that at Devoxx with Max and Emmanuel and thought it >> was okay to have 1.5 impl. of the specs (java.util.concurrent based) >> already. Apparently not :( What timeframe do you see 1.4 support being >> dropped? >> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Steve Ebersole<st...@hibernate.org> wrote: >> >>> I have issues reloading Maven-based projects in IntelliJ as well. I >>> simply try to minimize the number of times I reload. >>> >>> Hibernate is *built* with JDK 1.5, but not all the modules are 1.5 >>> compatible. >>> >>> What "statistics work" discussion? I must have missed that. But for >>> sure the hibernate-core module should remain 1.4 compatible. Dropping >>> 1.4 support is on the roadmap, but not for 3.5 >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 11:32 +0100, Alex Snaps wrote: >>> >>>> Hey, >>>> Doing a svn update of the Hibernate trunk, I realized I probably had >>>> changed the project to be Java5 manually as it reverted to 1.4 >>>> (because of some pom.xml change) in IntelliJ. >>>> Talking to Max and Emmanuel at Devoxx I thought trunk was now to be >>>> Java 5? Is this not the case after all, or are poms only update when >>>> the first Java5 language/jdk feature sneaks in? >>>> As discussed we discussed, all the statistics work heavily rely on >>>> java.util.concurrent classes, so that is "more or less" important for >>>> that patch... >>>> Btw do you guys have a contributor agreement somewhere, I couldn't find it. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Alex >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Steve Ebersole<st...@hibernate.org> >>> Hibernate.org >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
