Sébastien Hinderer (2018/06/14 14:27 +0200): > Ah, it's too bad. Because, what I forgot to mention is that the intent > behind all this is to make the recipe(s) a bit more complex by adding > other variables, namely CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS, to let the user (the > person who compiles the package) use them when desired. > > I that light, and to guarantee that all the rules are consistent, do you > think it would become worth defining a marco that takes as only argument > the pattern of the target?
I meant "In that lignt". Or perhaps, rather than putting the whole rule in a macro, I could define as a macro just the recipe? Would that be better style? Thanks again, Sébastien. _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list Help-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
