On Wed, 06 Nov 2002 23:25:45 GMT, "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:15817.42233.614501.391323@;lemming.engeast.baynetworks.com:
> %% gk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > g> Is there a naming convention for different kinds of makefiles, > g> aside from *.d for dependency makefiles and occasionally *.mk? > > Even .d is not really a convention; automake uses something quite > different. > > The only thing remotely approaching a convention is the .mk extension, > but even that is not universal. It's a good question, though; thanks to the O.P. for asking. Soren A _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
