Rodion Goritskov <[email protected]> writes: > Thank you very much for the hint!
My pleasure that this discussion could led you to something insightful! > Looks like currently rootless-podman-service-type can't be used > together with services using least-authority-wrapper (there are number > of them [1]) > > I filed a bug with the sample configuration, hope we can do something > about this [2]. > For now (if it is acceptable for you), you could switch to > docker-service-type (however, it is not rootless, AFAIK) In fact, my idea was to replace my current dockers with rootless-podman. Nothing urgent though, it will wait! > Sorry for the inconvenience! Nothing to be sorry about. Thanks again for your contribution. Cheers, Diego.
