>> So could you clarify on the point you made earlier? You've ran guix pack >> on Arch, sent it to Ubuntu, unpacked, ran, and the result you got was >> the same as on Arch? Or was the result the same as earlier on Ubuntu?
The result was the same as earlier on Ubuntu, the pack results are the same as the guix shell results, I don't get reproducibility across the two computers. >> What if you make the pack on Ubuntu, unpack and run it there, and on >> Arch as well? Nothing changes, still Ubuntu laptop and Arch laptop give different results, even though the pack are the same. ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Rutherther" <ruthert...@ditigal.xyz> > À: "Timothee Mathieu" <timothee.math...@inria.fr>, "help-guix" > <help-guix@gnu.org> > Envoyé: Samedi 3 Mai 2025 19:14:27 > Objet: Re: Reproducibility of guix shell container across different host OS > Timothee Mathieu <timothee.math...@inria.fr> writes: > >> Thanks, >> >> For checking that the environments were the same (point 1) from before), I >> tried >> both methods. Both gave me that the two environments (i.e. all the packages >> and >> dependencies) are exactly the same: the diff of the two guix graph was empty >> and the guix pack had exactly the same hash, so I did not even need >> diffoscope: >> everything is the same. >> >> Then, I don't know where is the problem and I have no idea how to debug it. >> It >> should be something that is not handled by guix shell, but as I don't >> understand enough what could possibly not be fixed by guix shell >> --container, I >> do not know where to look. > > So could you clarify on the point you made earlier? You've ran guix pack > on Arch, sent it to Ubuntu, unpacked, ran, and the result you got was > the same as on Arch? Or was the result the same as earlier on Ubuntu? > > What if you make the pack on Ubuntu, unpack and run it there, and on > Arch as well? > >> >> Best, >> Timothée
