Hi, On mer., 18 janv. 2023 at 20:40, Przemysław Kamiński via <help-guix@gnu.org> wrote:
> that produces cryptic docker image names like bash-coreutils-r-zhs. Well, this is an improvement compared to the previous behaviour. :-) See 0074844366381e3056d09492b8b437836c7adb61: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- pack: Provide a meaningful "repository name" for Docker. Previously, images produced by 'guix pack -f docker' would always show up as "profile" in the output of 'docker images'. With this change, 'docker images' shows a name constructed from the packages found in the image--e.g., "bash-coreutils-grep-sed". --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- And one thing discussed at the time of this change was that the rename for a more meaningful name could append on the Docker side. That’s said… > Maybe then add an option to guix pack to accept optional name? And if not > provided, fall back to manifest->friendly-name. …yes, I agree. It could be nice to be able to directly name the image. However, this would mean that the produced Docker pack would not be bit-to-bit reproducible considering the same manifest. Other said, the bit-to-bit reproducibility would require three inputs: the channels.scm file describing the revision of Guix (and potentially other channels), the manifest.scm file describing the packages and also the name provided at Docker pack build-time. Cheers, simon
