indieterminacy <indieterminacy@libre.brussels> anaandika: > On 10-07-2022 04:12, jgart wrote: >> Hi Guixers, >> >> Today Bonface mentioned to me that I should be cloning my packages and >> verifying the hashes with `git hash-object` or `git hash` iirc? >> > > Bonface gives very cogent demonstrations of workflow, encourage him to > do a screencast! >
I want to start online packaging/lisp-y/emacs-y
hang-outs here in Nairobi packaging meet-up thing
where we have recorded BBB sessions. Perhaps you
may find those helpful.
>> Do others do this when packaging?
>>
>> My workflow currently is the lazy way:
>>
>> 1. I change the version in the package definition.
>>
>> 2. build the package
>>
>> 3. package blows up on stdout
>>
>> 4. I retrieve the hash and add it
>>
>> 5. profit!
>>
>> But how can I trust that computed hash?
>>
>> wdyt
>
> Im slowly moving up the value-chain with my usage of Emacs' Git
> porceline, Magit.
>
> IMHO, the ultimate experience would be for everything operating from
> Magit's interface - for the beneficence of Guix.
>
FWIW, Magit runs on "transient" and IIRC you can
add anything to that interface. It was built,
just like GNU Emacs, to be extensible.
--
(Life is like a pencil that will surely run out,
but will leave the beautiful writing of life.)
(D4F09EB110177E03C28E2FE1F5BBAE1E0392253F
(hkp://keys.gnupg.net))
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
