On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:26:39 +0800 Feng Shu <tuma...@163.com> wrote: > jgart <jg...@dismail.de> writes: > > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 02:25:11 -0300 Thiago Jung Bauermann > > <bauerm...@kolabnow.com> wrote: > >> I don't understand why Guix thinks that. IIUC 950f3e… is a direct > >> descendant of 42679e… > > > > As of today now the has changed: > > > > ``` > > λ guix pull > > Updating channel 'guixrus' from Git repository at > > 'https://git.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/guixrus'...Updating channel 'nonguix' > > from Git repository at 'https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix'...Updating > > channel 'guix' from Git repository at > > 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'...guix pull: error: aborting > > update of channel 'guix' to commit > > 5743d505834a8b13778da2c969ea4e15bb7a3a75, which is not a descendant of > > 42679e3f81a0fa61e225b1f6aa0e80e39625372f > > hint: This could indicate that the channel has been tampered with and is > > trying to force a roll-back, preventing you from getting the latest > > updates. If you think this is not the case, explicitly allow non-forward > > updates. > > ``` > > > > I haven't allowed downgrades yet. > > > > Waiting to see if I get an answer first on why it's happening. > > Why not roll-back to an older guix, then try guix pull again?
Hi Feng, Thanks! that worked!!! I rolled back one generation and ran `guix pull`. all best, jgart
