Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> wrote: > This is about chrooting a serviceable Guix-the-package-manager, > not running Guix System/Shepherd in the chroot, right?
Exactly. You've understood correctly. > Did you manage to rescue your system in the end? Yup! > I find that claim surprising too. Running/rescuing Guix in a > chroot has never been anything less than routine IME (...I guess > that's a success story? :-) The steps[0] you use to chroot Guix > apply to most any other distribution. This is what I thought, too! That is part of the reason for this post. I was thinking that there *must* be something I am missing. You are probably correct that #guix was thinking I meant runnig Shepherd. Anyway, thank's for taking the time to clear that up. Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
