Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> wrote: > It's not very obvious what to document it since it applies to all WebKitGTK. > > It's part of the "general software knowledge". For instance, if you install > an archiver like `atool', it's your reponsibility to install the backends > (unzip, p7zip, etc.) to support the various archive formats. Where to > document this?
Normally, in the package relation graph itself. For instance, in Debian gstreamer1.0-libav and gstreamer1.0-plugins-good are _recommended_ by libwebkit2gtk-* packages. From a user point of view, that means that when he mark epiphany-browser for installing in a package manager, such as aptitude(1), they are marked as well, but, unlike hard dependencies, can be unmarked. The same applies to atool and its backends, by the way.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
