Thank you Zelphir, this looks great! Viet
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 22:24, Zelphir Kaltstahl <zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de> wrote: > There is at least one SRFI for a unit test library. Is that sufficient as > "support for TDD"? > > https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-64/srfi-64.html > > > On 9/11/19 10:53 PM, Viet Le wrote: > > Thanks for your recommendation. May I ask if Scheme has support for TDD or > are there any TDD libraries/frameworks in Scheme? A quick online search > didn’t show desired results. I found only TDD for Clojure. > > Thanks, > Viet > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 22:24, Zelphir Kaltstahl < > zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de> wrote: > >> I would like to add "The Little Schemer" to the list of good books >> suggested here. Damn did I get a lot out of that little book. It starts >> at the very beginning, but accelerates quickly. >> >> I would say I got more out of SICP than The Little Schemer, but both are >> phenomenal books in my opinion. SICP has many many pages and covers many >> topics. More than are treated in The Little Schemer, but the content in >> The Little Schemer is very enlightening as well, just like many things >> in SICP were for me. In The Little Schemer I read multiple chapters >> multiple times to get a better understanding and often was rewarded by >> understanding it better and even better, when I later typed that code >> into my machine and wrote comments for everything. I am far from >> finished with SICP, but I had a lot of "Aha!" moments with it too. Both >> highly recommended books, but they might take also some time to get >> through, if you have a job and not much time to spend on the books. >> >> Haven't read Practical Common Lisp. >> >> Realm of Racket was a little disappointing for me personally, as in my >> version there was some code missing and thus some example did not work >> (the procedure `decay` is missing in my book). I also did not buy in to >> the "Big bang" thingy that much. I would have preferred to write >> something on top of a minimalistic 2D engine instead. In general is it a >> nice idea though, to get content across by writing small games. >> >> I still have PAIP (Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming) >> here and am not sure how to sort it in. So far it has been good content, >> but I also have not progressed very far into it yet. I am rewriting the >> code in Scheme so far, when I try out the code of it. >> >> >> -- > Kind regards, > Viet > > -- Kind regards, Viet
