Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes: > Catonano (2016-07-17 14:15 +0300) wrote: [...] >> In the meantime, can I try geiser-next ? Or is it gonna break things >> irreparably ? > > Absolutely not! You can try it. Actually the mentioned bug was one of > the main reason that Christopher added 'geiser-next' package. I didn't > try it but it should work.
geiser-next exhibits the problem also.
