I deleted the databases for namestore and peerstore to get all processes 
running (peerstore and namestore was failing). But still no peer connections.

```
❯ gnunet-arm -I
Services (excluding stopped services):
(started: 23 / stopped: 22)
cadet (binary='gnunet-service-cadet', status=started)
core (binary='gnunet-service-core', status=started)
datastore (binary='gnunet-service-datastore', status=started)
dht (binary='gnunet-service-dht', status=started)
fs (binary='gnunet-service-fs', status=started)
gns (binary='gnunet-service-gns', status=started)
hostlist (binary='gnunet-daemon-hostlist', status=started)
identity (binary='gnunet-service-identity', status=started)
namecache (binary='gnunet-service-namecache', status=started)
namestore (binary='gnunet-service-namestore', status=started)
nat (binary='gnunet-service-nat', status=started)
nse (binary='gnunet-service-nse', status=started)
peerstore (binary='gnunet-service-peerstore', status=started)
reclaim (binary='gnunet-service-reclaim', status=started)
rest (binary='gnunet-rest-server', status=started)
revocation (binary='gnunet-service-revocation', status=started)
rps (binary='gnunet-service-rps', status=started)
setu (binary='gnunet-service-setu', status=started)
statistics (binary='gnunet-service-statistics', status=started)
topology (binary='gnunet-daemon-topology', status=started)
transport (binary='gnunet-service-transport', status=started)
communicator-tcp (binary='gnunet-communicator-tcp', status=started)
zonemaster (binary='gnunet-service-zonemaster', status=started)
```

On Sunday, March 10th, 2024 at 3:00 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin 
<schan...@gnunet.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> what does gnunet-arm -I output? Are all of the services running?
> For example, the peerstore database layout changed, so you probably have
> to delete your old database ($HOME/.local/share/gnunet/peerstore/sqlite.db).
> 
> The road to a stable TNG will also be bumpy, so we rely on reports such
> as this to iron out the remaining bugs with it.
> 
> BR
> Martin
> 
> On 10.03.24 06:08, marty1885 wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > 
> > I tried a few commands and still feels like my node is really not 
> > connected. DHT can't put, NSE returns a very small network size and GNS 
> > cannot resolve.
> > 
> > Is this expected?
> > 
> > ```
> > ❯ gnunet-core -si
> > Current local peer identity: 
> > CCXHBE49GRQVFAVFQ3BXVXPHHD63NG6ZNY31R0F59KVDZQA42PTG
> > (no further output)
> > 
> > ❯ gnunet-dht-put -k "hello" -d "world" -e 40m
> > (hangs, this used to return almost immidately)
> > 
> > ❯ gnunet-nse
> > 1710047156276913 1.688203 0.755488 1.474102
> > 
> > ❯ gnunet-gns -u gnunet.gns.alt -t PKEY
> > 
> > > > > Looking for `PKEY' records under` gnunet.gns.alt'
> > > > > (no output)
> > > > > ```
> > 
> > On Saturday, March 9th, 2024 at 11:39 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin 
> > schan...@gnunet.org wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > the behaviour of gnunet-core changed. You can check the new switches
> > > with --help.
> > > Long-term core connections are know to be problematic behind NATs, still.
> > > But with a freshly started peer, "gnunet-core -i" should give you your
> > > peer id, "gnunet-core -s" the connections (you can also combine the
> > > switches).
> > > The command should probably output the help when called without arguments.
> > > 
> > > BR
> > > Martin
> > > 
> > > On 09.03.24 14:55, marty1885 wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > I've just built and installed the new GNUnet 0.21. But my node isn't 
> > > > connected to any peer after hours of waiting. Running gnunet-core shows 
> > > > no node is connected to me.
> > > > 
> > > > `❯ gnunet-core (no output)`
> > > > 
> > > > I have also checked `iotop` and can confirm gnunet-service-transport 
> > > > isn't doing much IO. While I was expecting at least hundreds of Kbps 
> > > > from experience in the past.
> > > > 
> > > > How can I connect to the network? Please let me know what information I 
> > > > can provide to diagnose the issue.
> > > > 
> > > > Best,
> > > > Martin

Reply via email to