IMHO, stick with the provided RPM.  Its nice that Cfengine delivers this to the 
Linux folks, and I wish more pre-built packages for other Unix O/S’s are 
available.

If you use the provided bits, it provides a known baseline for submitting bug 
reports.  When we have to compile, we’re building against various versions of 
dependencies, which introduce new variables into how the software behaves.

The shipped RPM comes with the needed libraries (libpcre, libdb, libgcc, etc.) 
to make the stack work, on known versions of these dependencies.

I would personally focus my time in building out the config management / 
infrastructure to solve your problems, and stay away from compiling if 
possible.  Just my $0.02.  I understand the “I don’t know what code is really 
being shipped here” argument from accepting pre-compiled binaries, but then 
again, unless you are a few select developers who actually maintain this 
project, you aren’t going to comprehend what is contained in the source code 
anyways.

Cheers
Mike



On 1/27/11 10:38 AM, "Frans Lawaetz" <fr...@broadinstitute.org> wrote:



Is it possible to get the spec file that is used to create the RPM I currently 
download from the engine room for the free version of cfengine.  I would rather 
roll my own RPM's, however i do not want to attempt to reinvent the wheel 
creating a new spec file.  Or even letting us download the src rpm would work 
well too.


I don't believe cfengine makes SRPMS available.  I've seen evidence of people 
creating their own on this list so you might want to dig around and ask for a 
copy.


________________________________
_______________________________________________
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
_______________________________________________
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine

Reply via email to