On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:21:57AM -0400, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
>Forum: Cfengine Help
>Subject: Re: release candidate suggestion
>Author: Authority
>Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17496,17565#msg-17565
>
>intermediary/patch releases. I can't seem to find the magic incantation
>to build from SVN but released tarballs haven't yet given me any issues,
This magic incantation (swiped from a sage wiser than me) has worked
quite well on CentOS 5.x systems:
svn co https://svn.iu.hio.no/projects/cfengine-3/trunk
(or svn update, if you already have a copy checked out...)
aclocal
automake -a -c
autoconf
autoreconf --force --install --symlink
./configure --with-pcre --with-tokyocabinet --without-sql
--with-graphviz
make
Obviously, you'll need libtokyocabinet, PCRE, and graphviz installed.
If you cut out graphviz, and reduce the number of library dependencies
by quite a bit.
>so I'm stuck testing a release and then waiting another 3 months for the
>next one to fix any bugs I might have hit. Currently, I'm unwilling
>to move to 3.0.5 at this time because of a bug I hit, which has since
>been fixed (so I've been told), but I'm not going to be able test
>that until 3.0.6. And 3.0.5 has some fixes for bugs in 3.0.4 that I'd
>love to see squashed, so I'm stuck choosing between which bugs I want.
>Typically I love to be on the bleeding edge and work in an environment
>without strict change management, so it's pretty easy to do testing,
>if only I could actually build the software.
>
>I suppose if someone from Cfengine could simply provide the process
>to take an SVN tree to a "releasable" tarball, I would gladly do that
>portion myself, releasing Cfengine from whatever QA process you like
>to do before making such official releases, but still allowing me to do
>more gradual testing.
--
Jesse Becker
NHGRI Linux support (Digicon Contractor)
_______________________________________________
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
