I just noticed that the hashing code in 2.1.21 matched the code that you patched in 2.2.x so I assume the bug is still there. I haven't actually tried to reproduce the effects though.
Do you just have to define a macro that hashes to zero in order to replicate the problem? Or do you have to use the macro for something? Paul Krizak 7171 Southwest Pkwy MS B200.3A Senior Systems Engineer Austin, TX 78735 Advanced Micro Devices Desk: (512) 602-8775 Linux/Unix Systems Engineering Cell: (512) 791-0686 Global IT Infrastructure Fax: (512) 602-0468 On 04/13/10 04:27, fo...@cfengine.com wrote: > Paul: Did you manage to reproduce the bug in 2.1.21, or did you just > notice that the bug was present in that version of the code? If you > are able to reproduce it, I'll file a bug report. _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
