On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 10:48 +0200, Hans Åberg wrote: > Your base class copy constructor is marked delete:
Yes, it needs to stay deleted (intentional). But if the derived class's copy constructor explicitly calls the base class's default constructor in the initialization list, it compiles without warning. I'm assuming upstream might not have been using gcc, or at least another version of it, because gcc expects it in the initialization list. Thanks for your tips Hans. -- Kip Warner | Senior Software Engineer OpenPGP signed/encrypted mail preferred http://www.thevertigo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
