Le 5 avr. 2013 à 01:25, Adam Smalin <acidzombi...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> I believe %prec is what I want but it DOESN'T do what I want. I don't > understand what it actually does. Why isn't it making the below the same? > > | rval '<' '<' rval %prec LSHIFT > | rval LSHIFT' rval > > It doesn't seem to change the precedence. It isn't evaluating the variable > before < < like << does. It does ((intVar1<intVar2)<intVar3)< < Foo i > believe. It isn't doing intVar3< < Foo which is what i checked for. You need to read carefully the documentation to understand why it does not do what you'd like it to. Have you tried to have two different ">" tokens, as I suggested, one standing for "> followed by >" and "> not followed by >"? Both denoting a single >, but with embedded information on the following token. _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
