On 21 May 2012, at 16:02, Akim Demaille wrote: > Le 21 mai 2012 à 15:41, Hans Aberg a écrit : > >> On 21 May 2012, at 11:34, Akim Demaille wrote: >> >>>> Is there a better way to do it? >>> >>> This is indeed a problem. I'm sure what the best way to >>> address this is. In addition, in some cases, creating the >>> files location.hh, stack.hh etc. is more troublesome than >>> useful. >> >> Perhaps add infixes 'loc', 'stk', etc., so that a parser with name <name> >> gets files >> <name>.loc.h >> <name>.stk.h >> etc. > > Actually I want to have stack.hh disapear (it does not > need to be exposed). It's a good idea though for the > others, but since people want to be able to rename, > it shall be more general. > > position.hh does not need to exist either, it can live > within location.hh.
Is there any reason to not put all stuff that is public in the parser header? This would eliminate the need for any additional header files. Hans _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
