Di-an JAN wrote: >> From: Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:59:16 +0100 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], help-bison@gnu.org >> Subject: Proposals for various changes to the Java parser >> >>> 5. Work around Java's ``code too large'' limitation for large parser >>> tables. >>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-bison/2008-10/msg00005.html >> >> I think switching unconditionally to one-initializer-per-table is the >> easiest approach by far, and gives 99% of the benefit. > > I implemented the version that allows more than about 10000 states, > symbols, rules, and table entries, just to show that it could be done > with only changes to the Java skeleton. Then it's easy to stripped down > to the simpler version. I don't really care which version is comitted.
I committed the simpler version for now. Thanks! Paolo _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
