Kelly,
>> to >> >> add-expr: >> mul-expr | >> mult-expr '+' add-expr | >> mult-expr '-' add-expr ; >> > >I don't think that's what you want if you're planning >on executing the code you generate from this... A subsequent phase of processing can be used to reverse this syntactic decision. >By the way, you might want to have a look at > >http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/ANSI-C-grammar-y.html Thanks, but this grammar requires a symbol table. It also contains lots of shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts, and if I was writing a more conventional grammar I would want to remove these. derek -- Derek M Jones tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667 Knowledge Software Ltd mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Applications Standards Conformance Testing http://www.knosof.co.uk _______________________________________________ Help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
