Follow-up Comment #6, task #16399 (project health):
Great! I think "source" fits nicely :)
One issue I see from "patient" is too vague in terms of the source. When we
say "patient", are we implying that the individual is both a human and someone
that exist on the patient DB?
Would the terms "human" and "other" work as one entry?
We need to distinguish the individual source from specimen / sample (eg, liver
biopsy, blood.. ). The test itself should have this information.
Would the field source fit this purpose?
Agree to keep the model very simple for the task! :)
Best
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?16399>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
