Follow-up Comment #3, bug #63535 (project health): Hi, Mathias!
[comment #2 comment #2:] > > I agree that standards should be adhered to, but sometime standards seem not to be esatblished by real life work. > True. Agree many times "standards" are made by bureaucratsthat want to get the clerical work done by health professionals, and do not have a correlation with the medical, day by day practice. > From https://www.aapc.com/blog/42585-chief-complaint-required/ > > "If the patient record does not reflect a chief complaint, the service is either: > > A preventive service; or > Unbillable. > " > > So in the case of e.g. a Corona immunization there is nothing in the CC and it is difficult to write something into HPI, because there is no illness. But yes, a standard is a standard... ;) Yes. GNU Health has medical visits of type: - Well-child visit - Well-[woman|man] visit - Chronic / followup In those cases no need for CC or HPI. In any case, they're optional. For immunizations, best is to use the vaccination model, not the evaluation, although you could use both. Bests Luis _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63535> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
