Dear GNU Health users and hackers, happy new and healthy year!
This is a gentle reminder in case you have not given your vote yet. The poll will close on Wednesday, 15 Jan at 24.00h CET. It was four weeks online then. Use the opportunity to let us know your opinion! https://forms.gle/StixA441JgpT2dfD7 Thanks! Axel -- Meet GNU Health at FOSDEM 2020, 01.-02.02.2020 in Brussels/BE http://fosdem.org (you find us at the openSUSE booth) ---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ---------- Betreff: Poll: GNU Health Packets Datum: Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2019, 20:13:14 CET Von: Axel Braun <axel.br...@gnuhealth.org> An: hea...@gnu.org, health-dev@gnu.org Dear GNU Health Users, having spoken to a couple of people during HealthCon, a question came into my mind: How shall we build packages in the future? In openSUSE we have all modules in one package: zypper install gnuhealth installs the server and all GNU Health modules. No doubt, this is very convenient. You can still activate only those modules that you really need, and the rest just uses some disk space (and maybe some milliseconds processing time during startup). An alternative would be to have one packet per module - this is basically how GNU Health is presented on Pypi, and how it was done for Debian. It allows you to only install what you really need and do some fine-tuning of your installation (of course you can add modules later!) So, each option has pros and cons. Let me know your opinion and vote here: https://forms.gle/StixA441JgpT2dfD7 Thanks! Axel -- Meet GNU Health at FOSDEM 2020, 01.-02.02.2020 in Brussels/BE http://fosdem.org (you find us at the openSUSE booth)
