Good morning , Am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2019, 06:59:36 CET schrieb Adolfina Bory Palobo via Health-dev: > Before voting I would like to ask: > > Is this question relating to SUSE packaging only?
Generally speaking no, but in the end it is up to each package maintainer how to best integrate it into the target system > Are these alternatives mutually exclusive - meaning whichever loses the > poll will be dropped? Personally - I think so.That would be even more confusing to have the same software twice in different packages..... > Another issue is that there is always a security risk in installing > software (modules) that is "unused" because it may ## become ## used by > hackers - so a small convenience breeds a potential insecurity. We all > agree that in the health domain, security must be an important concern, > possibly an overriding concern. I believe the convenience is not worth > it. (So you already know which way I will vote :-) In general you are right, and it is great that you focus on security! In fact for a GNU Health module I do not see that risk.... Cheers Axel -- Meet GNU Health at FOSDEM 2020, 01.-02.02.2020 in Brussels/BE http://fosdem.org (you find us at the openSUSE booth)
