Just to clarify... gnuhealth-control works perfectly on openSUSE standard installation (as described in https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/GNU_Health/Installation )
Here we are discussing about the *packages* provided by distros. Best Luis On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 14:51:34 +0000 Luis Falcon <fal...@gnuhealth.org> wrote: > Hi Axel ! > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 15:06:09 +0100 > Axel Braun <axel.br...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > Hi Luis, > > > > Am Samstag, 23. November 2019, 18:36:35 CET schrieb Luis Falcon: > > > (main article at > > > https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=9603) > > > > Savannah seems to be unavailable at the moment > > > > It seems to be OK now: Check > https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/health/ > > Nevertheless, I am also mirroring the files both gnuhealth.org and in > Sourceforge > > > > Dear community > > > > > > GNU Health 3.6.2 patchset has been released ! > > > > the current tarball on pypi.io seems to be broken: It has only 770k > > and basically no modules inside. > > The file is OK, but remember that "gnuhealth" is just the health > package, that is why it's only 770K. Just did an installation and > worked fine. (pip3 install --user gnuhealth) > > The rest of the packages are also there gnuhealth_archives, > gnuhealth_gyneco .... > > > > The GNU Health control center works on standard installations > > > (those done following the installation manual on wikibooks). > > > Don't use it if you use an alternative method or if your > > > distribution does not follow the GNU Health packaging guidelines. > > > > > > > Can we agree on a slightly different wording here? > > > > The GNU Health control center works on standard installations (those > > done from source files as described on wikibooks). > > Don't use it if you use the packages provided by your > > Linux-Distribution. Here the system takes care about patches. > > You should customize gnuhealth-control so it works on openSUSE, either > by calling internally zypper in or whatever you deem appropriate to > achieve the same task as "gnuhealth-control update". That way we get > close to the ideal 1-1 relationship on the standard and the openSUSE > package. > > I think you already have done something like that already to adapt > gnuhealth-control getlang. > > Moreover, I have to know *exactly* which system distribution. In > this case, it would be openSUSE. I can not talk for any others until > they have been verified. > > > > I have applied the patch to the openSUSE packages of release 3.6.1, > > so it has the same patch level as the 3.6.2 release. > > Excellent ! Thanks Axel ! > > All the best,
