Hello Luis Yes, you are right, however it is far from having "Infraestructure as code", what I mean is having health on a way on working as Continues Delivery and Continues Integration, considering that implementing ERP requires more than just install
What do you think about that? Best regards 2016-04-05 12:05 GMT-05:00 Luis Falcon <fal...@gnu.org>: > Hi Carlos ! > On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:55:29 -0500 > Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto <carlos.sotelo.pi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Coders > > > > I would like to propose a discussion about Health deployment. I mean, > > work on the Vagrant and install script > > > > Each time that I need to upgrade versions or deploy with extra > > modules I need to do too much losing my custom code, for example, I > > was working on 2.8 version, and build extra modules, in order to > > deploy on testing server, I had had to install the server, but with > > extra customization cause on new requirements and custom modules, > > after an upgrade, I have lost my custom changes and modules, I must > > do a copy paste and update vagrant file. > > > When using the standard GNU Health installation, the command > "gnuhealth-control update" will update Tryton and GNU Health, and > relink your custom modules (under the "local" directory). > > This applies for current deployment updates. WHen you want to upgrade > the GNU Health from one version to the other, then it's done manually. > This makes sense, since it involves change on API. > > Bests, > Luis > > -- Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto Senior Software Analyst Developer Claro RPC +51983265994 | MOV RPM( # ) +51 966110066 GTalk: carlos.sotelo.pi...@gmail.com | Skype: csotelop GNULinux RU #379182 | GNULinux RM #277661 No availability between 08:30 and 18:00, I will answer as soon as posible Please consider the environment before printing this email Join the campaign at http://thinkBeforePrinting.org