Hi Ceci ! On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:36:21 -0300 Maria Cecilia Santos Popper <cecili...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would really like to help with this issue. > It would be great to have a new module to manage vaccines. Thank you ! Nice module ahead :) > > The tabular interfaces seems a good option. > Another usefull option would be to be able to group patients with a > due or pending vaccine according to a geographic area in order to be > able to plan campaings more easily. > > Another important issue is stock control, and being able to trace > vaccines lots, refrigeration chain, etc. Yes. This should be part of the health_stock module > In Argentina we have a huge vaccination schedule with more than 12 > different vaccines in the first 6 years, son there is a lot of > information to process, so is the nurses workload. > This would be a great feature for 2.8 version! > > Count me in to work on this I just wrote back to Andrew in the list, so any comments / suggestions are most welcome :) Best, > > Cecilia > El 26/10/2014 08:43, "andrewpgledh...@tiscali.co.uk" < > andrewpgledh...@tiscali.co.uk> escribió: > > > Yes Luis, I agree that the WHO list should be used as a reference > > resource in > > GNU Health. > > > > What about functionality? Some ideas: > > > > > > > > When opening the patient > > record, a pop up message occurs in GNU Health for all "patients" < > > 18 years old. > > > > "Do you want to review / amend this patient's routine immunisation > > record?" > > > > If yes then a tabular form could appear with the child's > > immunisation record to date. > > > > If a date had been passed without the record being "ticked as > > administered" then it might have a red background. > > > > > > > > Other ideas might be to > > produce standard reports which would list all patients due to have > > vaccines on > > a particular day / week. The child health professional could then > > contact the > > family to bring the child into clinic. > > > > I think we both agree that this is very > > important GNU Health functionality and is well worth a significant > > amount of > > development time. > > > > Regards > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > >
