Are you using CMS? How big is young gen?
How often does the NN do young gen collection when it is slow?

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:04 AM Lin,Yiqun(vip.com) <yiqun01....@vipshop.com>
wrote:

> Hi hdfs developers:
>
> We meet a bad problem after rolling upgrade our hadoop version from
> 2.5.0-cdh5.3.2 to 2.6.0-cdh5.13.1. The problem is that we find NN running
> slow periodically (around a week). Concretely to say, For example, we
> startup NN on Monday, it will run fast. But time coming to Weekends, our
> cluster will become very slow.
>
> In the beginning, we thought maybe some FSN lock caused by this. And we
> did some improvements for this, e.g. configurable the remove block
> interval, print FSN lock elapsed time. After this, the problem still
> exists, :(. So we suspect this maybe not a hdfs rpc problem.
>
> Finally we find a related phenomenon: every time NN runs slow, its old gen
> reaches a high value, around 100GB. Actually, NN total metadata size is
> just around 40GB in our clsuter. So for the temporary solution, we reduce
> the heap space and trigger full gc frequently. Now it looks better than
> before but we haven’t found the root cause of this. Not so sure if this is
> a jvm tuning problem or a hdfs bug?
>
> Anyone who has met the similar problem in this version? Why the NN old gen
> space greatly increased?
>
> Some information of our env:
> JDK1.8
> 500+ Nodes, 150 million blocks, around 40GB metadata size will be used.
>
> Appreciate if anyone who can share your comments.
>
> Thanks
> Yiqun.
> 本电子邮件可能为保密文件。如果阁下非电子邮件所指定之收件人,谨请立即通知本人。敬请阁下不要使用、保存、复印、打印、散布本电子邮件及其内容,或将其用于其他任何目的或向任何人披露。谢谢您的合作!
> This communication is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain
> information that is privileged and confidential. You are hereby notified
> that, if you are not an intended recipient listed above, or an authorized
> employee or agent of an addressee of this communication responsible for
> delivering e-mail messages to an intended recipient, any dissemination,
> distribution or reproduction of this communication (including any
> attachments hereto) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by a reply e-mail
> addressed to the sender and permanently delete the original e-mail
> communication and any attachments from all storage devices without making
> or otherwise retaining a copy.
>

Reply via email to