`mvn install` fails on trunk right now due to javadoc error in yarn-api. Is that related? If so, can we revert or fix ASAP please?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:05 AM Naganarasimha Garla < naganarasimha...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > Me and Sunil have successfully merged YARN-3409 to the trunk and > we have created new umbrella jira YARN-8766 to track the pending jiras and > the remaining planned improvement features. > Thanks all for the support ! > > Regards, > + Naga > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:46 AM Naganarasimha Garla < > naganarasimha...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > Voting has been running since 6 days and adding my vote we have > 4 > > binding and 2 non binding +1's with no -1's this voting passes and we > will > > be merging the branch shortly. Thanks for all who participated in the > > discussion and voting thread ! > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > + Naga > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:50 PM Zian Chen <zc...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 for merge. > >> > >> > On Sep 9, 2018, at 10:47 PM, Weiwei Yang <abvclo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > +1 for the merge > >> > > >> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM Rohith Sharma K S < > >> > rohithsharm...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> >> +1 for merge > >> >> > >> >> -Rohith Sharma K S > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 18:01, Naganarasimha Garla < > >> >> naganarasimha...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Hi All, > >> >>> Thanks for feedback folks, based on the positive response > >> >> starting > >> >>> a Vote thread for merging YARN-3409 to master. > >> >>> > >> >>> Regards, > >> >>> + Naga & Sunil > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 2:51 am Wangda Tan, <wheele...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> +1 for the merge, it gonna be a great addition to 3.2.0 release. > >> Thanks > >> >>> to > >> >>>> everybody for pushing this feature to complete. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Best, > >> >>>> Wangda > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 8:25 AM Bibinchundatt < > >> >> bibin.chund...@huawei.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> +1 for merge. Fetaure would be a good addition to 3.2 release. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>>> Bibin A Chundatt > >> >>>>> M: +91-9742095715<tel:+91-9742095715> > >> >>>>> E: bibin.chund...@huawei.com<mailto:bibin.chund...@huawei.com> > >> >>>>> 2012<tel:2012>实验室-印研IT&Cloud BU分部 > >> >>>>> 2012<tel:2012> Laboratories-IT&Cloud BU Branch Dept. > >> >>>>> From:Naganarasimha Garla > >> >>>>> To:common-...@hadoop.apache.org,Hdfs-dev, > yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org > >> , > >> >>>>> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org, > >> >>>>> Date:2018-08-29 20:00:44 > >> >>>>> Subject:[Discuss] Merge discussion for Node attribute support > >> feature > >> >>>>> YARN-3409 > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Hi All, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> We would like to hear your thoughts on merging “Node Attributes > >> >> Support > >> >>> in > >> >>>>> YARN” branch (YARN-3409) [2] into trunk in a few weeks. The goal > is > >> to > >> >>> get > >> >>>>> it in for HADOOP 3.2. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> *Major work happened in this branch* > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> YARN-6858. Attribute Manager to store and provide node attributes > in > >> >> RM > >> >>>>> YARN-7871. Support Node attributes reporting from NM to RM( > >> >> distributed > >> >>>>> node attributes) > >> >>>>> YARN-7863. Modify placement constraints to support node attributes > >> >>>>> YARN-7875. Node Attribute store for storing and recovering > >> attributes > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> *Detailed Design:* > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Please refer [1] for detailed design document. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> *Testing Efforts:* > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> We did detailed tests for the feature in the last few weeks. > >> >>>>> This feature will be enabled only when Node Attributes constraints > >> are > >> >>>>> specified through SchedulingRequest from AM. > >> >>>>> Manager implementation will help to store and recover Node > >> Attributes. > >> >>>>> This > >> >>>>> works with existing placement constraints. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> *Regarding to API stability:* > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> All newly added @Public APIs are @Unstable. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Documentation jira [3] could help to provide detailed > configuration > >> >>>>> details. This feature works from end-to-end and we tested this in > >> our > >> >>>>> local > >> >>>>> cluster. Branch code is run against trunk and tracked via [4]. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> We would love to get your thoughts before opening a voting thread. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Special thanks to a team of folks who worked hard and contributed > >> >>> towards > >> >>>>> this efforts including design discussion / patch / reviews, etc.: > >> >> Weiwei > >> >>>>> Yang, Bibin Chundatt, Wangda Tan, Vinod Kumar Vavilappali, > >> >> Konstantinos > >> >>>>> Karanasos, Arun Suresh, Varun Saxena, Devaraj Kavali, Lei Guo, > Chong > >> >>> Chen. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> [1] : > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12937633/Node-Attributes-Requirements-Design-doc_v2.pdf > >> >>>>> [2] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3409 > >> >>>>> [3] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7865 > >> >>>>> [4] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8718 > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>> + Naga & Sunil Govindan > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Weiwei Yang > >> > >> >
