+1.

Skimmed through the design doc and uber patch and seems to be reasonable.

This is a welcome addition especially w.r.t. cloud deployments so thanks to
everyone who worked on this.

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Rohith Sharma K S <rohithsharm...@apache.org
> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Nov 30, 2017 7:26 AM, "Sunil G" <sun...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> > Based on the discussion at [1], I'd like to start a vote to merge feature
> > branch
> >
> > YARN-5881 to trunk. Vote will run for 7 days, ending Wednesday Dec 6 at
> > 6:00PM PDT.
> >
> >
> > This branch adds support to configure queue capacity as absolute resource
> > in
> >
> > capacity scheduler. This will help admins who want fine control of
> > resources of queues.
> >
> >
> > Feature development is done at YARN-5881 [2], jenkins build is here
> > (YARN-7510 [3]).
> >
> > All required tasks for this feature are committed. This feature changes
> > RM’s Capacity Scheduler only,
> >
> > and we did extensive tests for the feature in the last couple of months
> > including performance tests.
> >
> >
> > Key points:
> >
> > - The feature is turned off by default, and have to configure absolute
> > resource to enable same.
> >
> > - Detailed documentation about how to use this feature is done as part of
> > [4].
> >
> > - No major performance degradation is observed with this branch work. SLS
> > and UT performance
> >
> > tests are done.
> >
> >
> > There were 11 subtasks completed for this feature.
> >
> >
> > Huge thanks to everyone who helped with reviews, commits, guidance, and
> >
> > technical discussion/design, including Wangda Tan, Vinod Vavilapalli,
> > Rohith Sharma K S, Eric Payne .
> >
> >
> > [1] :
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn-dev/201711.mbox/%
> > 3CCACYiTuhKhF1JCtR7ZFuZSEKQ4sBvN_n_tV5GHsbJ3YeyJP%2BP4Q%
> > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > [2] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5881
> >
> > [3] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7510
> >
> > [4] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7533
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Sunil and Wangda
> >
>

Reply via email to