+1 from me too for the branching proposal.

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Eric Payne <
eric.payne1...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

> +1 for this branching proposal.-Eric
>
>
>       From: Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com>
>  To: "common-...@hadoop.apache.org" <common-...@hadoop.apache.org>; "
> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" <mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org>; "
> hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; "
> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" <yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org>
>  Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 12:36 PM
>  Subject: [DISCUSS] Branches and versions for Hadoop 3
>
> Hi folks,
>
> With 3.0.0-beta1 fast approaching, I wanted to go over the proposed
> branching strategy.
>
> In the early 2.x days, moving trunk immediately to 3.0.0 was a mistake.
> branch-2 and trunk were virtually identical, and increased backport
> complexity. Until we need to make incompatible changes, there's no need for
> a Hadoop 4.0 version.
>
> Thus, here's a proposal of branches and versions:
>
> trunk: 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> branch-3.0: 3.0.0-beta1-SNAPSHOT
> branch-2 and etc: remain as is
>
> LMK questions/comments/etc. Appreciate your attentiveness; I'm hoping to
> build consensus quickly since we have a number of open VOTEs for branch
> merges.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to