+1 from me too for the branching proposal. On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Eric Payne < eric.payne1...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 for this branching proposal.-Eric > > > From: Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> > To: "common-...@hadoop.apache.org" <common-...@hadoop.apache.org>; " > mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" <mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org>; " > hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; " > yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" <yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org> > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 12:36 PM > Subject: [DISCUSS] Branches and versions for Hadoop 3 > > Hi folks, > > With 3.0.0-beta1 fast approaching, I wanted to go over the proposed > branching strategy. > > In the early 2.x days, moving trunk immediately to 3.0.0 was a mistake. > branch-2 and trunk were virtually identical, and increased backport > complexity. Until we need to make incompatible changes, there's no need for > a Hadoop 4.0 version. > > Thus, here's a proposal of branches and versions: > > trunk: 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT > branch-3.0: 3.0.0-beta1-SNAPSHOT > branch-2 and etc: remain as is > > LMK questions/comments/etc. Appreciate your attentiveness; I'm hoping to > build consensus quickly since we have a number of open VOTEs for branch > merges. > > Thanks, > Andrew > > > >