Allen, can you make that JIRA a blocker with that rationale so that it can be discussed so on the JIRA?
Thanks +Vinod On Feb 14, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Allen Wittenauer <a...@altiscale.com> wrote: > > IMO, HDFS-5796 (in some form or another) is a blocker for 2.7. > > Right now, DFS browsing is pretty much broken on secure systems when a > hadoop-auth-compatible plugin is in use. The "fix" (HDFS-5716) introduced > (what appears to be) an incompatible and undocumented method to provide auth > versus the rest of Hadoop. > > On Feb 14, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Ravi Prakash <ravi...@ymail.com> wrote: > >> I would like the improvements to the Namenode UI be included in 2.7 too. >> HDFS-7588. All the code is ready and we can try to get as much of it in as >> possible piecemeal. >> >> >> On Saturday, February 14, 2015 3:52 AM, Steve Loughran >> <ste...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On 14 February 2015 at 00:37:07, Karthik Kambatla >> (ka...@cloudera.com<mailto:ka...@cloudera.com>) wrote: >> >> 2 weeks from now (end of Feb) sounds reasonable. The one feature I would >> like for to be included is shared-cache: we are pretty close - two more >> main items to take care of. >> >> In an offline conversation, Steve mentioned building Windows binaries for >> our releases. Do we want to do that for 2.7? If so, can anyone with Windows >> expertise setup a Jenkins job to build these artifacts, and may be hook it >> up to https://builds.apache.org/job/HADOOP2_Release_Artifacts_Builder/ >> >> >> >> >> >> someone will have to first fix MiniYarnCluster to come up on the ASF jenkins >> machines; it currently fails with directory permission setup problems that >> may matter in production, but not in test runs. >> >> >