Allen, can you make that JIRA a blocker with that rationale so that it can be 
discussed so on the JIRA?

Thanks
+Vinod

On Feb 14, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Allen Wittenauer <a...@altiscale.com> wrote:

> 
> IMO, HDFS-5796 (in some form or another) is a blocker for 2.7. 
> 
> Right now, DFS browsing is pretty much broken on secure systems when a 
> hadoop-auth-compatible plugin is in use.  The "fix" (HDFS-5716) introduced 
> (what appears to be) an incompatible and undocumented method to provide auth 
> versus the rest of Hadoop.
> 
> On Feb 14, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Ravi Prakash <ravi...@ymail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I would like the improvements to the Namenode UI be included in 2.7 too. 
>> HDFS-7588. All the code is ready and we can try to get as much of it in as 
>> possible piecemeal.
>> 
>> 
>>    On Saturday, February 14, 2015 3:52 AM, Steve Loughran 
>> <ste...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 14 February 2015 at 00:37:07, Karthik Kambatla 
>> (ka...@cloudera.com<mailto:ka...@cloudera.com>) wrote:
>> 
>> 2 weeks from now (end of Feb) sounds reasonable. The one feature I would
>> like for to be included is shared-cache: we are pretty close - two more
>> main items to take care of.
>> 
>> In an offline conversation, Steve mentioned building Windows binaries for
>> our releases. Do we want to do that for 2.7? If so, can anyone with Windows
>> expertise setup a Jenkins job to build these artifacts, and may be hook it
>> up to https://builds.apache.org/job/HADOOP2_Release_Artifacts_Builder/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> someone will have to first fix MiniYarnCluster to come up on the ASF jenkins 
>> machines; it currently fails with directory permission setup problems that 
>> may matter in production, but not in test runs.
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to