+1

> On Feb 25, 2014, at 3:42 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <szets...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi hdfs-dev,
> 
> We propose merging the HDFS-5535 branch to trunk.
> 
> HDFS Rolling Upgrade is a feature to allow upgrading individual HDFS daemons. 
>  In Hadoop v2, HDFS supports highly-available (HA) namenode services and wire 
> compatibility. These two capabilities make it feasible to upgrade HDFS 
> without incurring HDFS downtime.  We make such improvement in the HDFS-5535 
> branch.
> 
> The HDFS-5535 branch is ready to be merged to trunk.  As this being written, 
> there are 48 subtasks in HDFS-5535; 44 subtasks are already completed.  The 
> core developments including feature development, unit tests and user doc, are 
> already done.  The merge patch posted a few ago already passed Jenkins.  I 
> will post a updated patch to trigger Jenkins again for the latest code base.
> 
> The remaining JIRAs are:
> 
> HDFS-3225: Revist upgrade snapshots, roll back, finalize to enable rolling 
> upgrades (assigned to Sanjay)
> HDFS-6000: Avoid saving namespace when starting rolling upgrade (assigned to 
> Jing)
> HDFS-6013: add rollingUpgrade information to  latest UI (assigned to Vinay)
> HDFS-6016: Update datanode replacement policy to make writes more robust 
> (assigned to Kihwal)
> 
> HDFS-6000 will be committed soon.  All other issues are further improvements 
> which can be done after merge.
> 
> The other remaining works are:
> - Revise the design doc
> - Post a test plan (Haohui is working on it.)
> - Execute the manual tests (Haohui and Fengdong will work on it.)
> 
> The work was a collective effort of Nathan Roberts, Sanjay Radia, Suresh 
> Srinivas, Kihwal Lee, Jing Zhao, Arpit Agarwal, Brandon Li, Haohui Mai, 
> Vinayakumar B, Fengdong Yu, Chris Nauroth and Tsz-Wo Nicholas Sze, who have 
> proposed the design, worked on the code, reviewed patches, tested the 
> features and authored documentation.  We thank everyone that who has gave us 
> valuable comments and feedback on the feature.
> 
> The vote runs for 7 days.  Here is my +1 on the merge.
> 
> Thanks.
> Tsz-Wo

Reply via email to